Libertarians recognize that the internet poses real risks to children. The question is not whether these problems exist, but whether government regulation is the best solution. Libertarians argue it is not. Heavy-handed regulation often punishes ordinary users and innovators, erodes privacy, and threatens free speech---while doing little to stop determined bad actors.
Instead, libertarians emphasize voluntary, decentralized solutions. Families, churches, schools, and local communities are best positioned to guide children and build resilience. Parents should have access to effective tools---such as filters, monitoring software, and educational programs---developed by private companies and nonprofits that can adapt faster than government mandates. Civil society can also provide victim support, raise awareness, and foster digital literacy to equip young people to navigate online spaces wisely.
Children need education as much as they need protection. While the internet carries risks, it is also a tool that parents can use---and teach their children to use responsibly. Decisions about what children should or should not see belong with parents, not the state.
Where crimes like exploitation or trafficking occur, they should be addressed through targeted law enforcement with due process, not blanket restrictions on the entire internet.
This question is from Faith Seeking Freedom: Updated & Expanded, available in paperback, PDF, and Kindle.